anti cftr rabbit polyclonal igg antibody (Alomone Labs)
Structured Review

Anti Cftr Rabbit Polyclonal Igg Antibody, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 71 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyclonal+anti+cftr+antibodies/Anti-CFTR+Antibody/10__1113_slash_jp287289-86-15-23
Average 95 stars, based on 71 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Restoring CFTR function with Orkambi decreases the severity of alcohol‐induced acute pancreatitis"
Article Title: Restoring CFTR function with Orkambi decreases the severity of alcohol‐induced acute pancreatitis
Journal: The Journal of Physiology
doi: 10.1113/jp287289
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. Effect of ethanol on CFTR expression A, representative histological images show CFTR expression after treatment of the pancreatic ducts with ethanol (EtOH; 30, 50 and 100 mM) for 12 h. Pancreas slices were excited at 405 nm (Hoechst 33342) and 488 nm (Alexa Fluor 488), and emissions were collected at 405–465 and 488–550 nm, respectively. B, summary bar charts show the mean fluorescence intensity in the ductal cells normalized to the ductal area and expressed in arbitrary units. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.001 (30 mM EtOH), P < 0.001 (50 mM EtOH) and P < 0.001 (100 mM EtOH) vs. apical staining intensity of control. ∗∗P = 0.012 (50 mM EtOH) and P < 0.001 (100 mM EtOH) vs. cytoplasm staining intensity of control. ns = no significance, P = 0.781 (30 mM EtOH vs. cytoplasm staining intensity of control) (n = 5–8 per group).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Fluorescence, Staining, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 3. Effect of VX-809 on CFTR expression Representative histological images show CFTR expression after treatment of the pancreatic ducts with ethanol (EtOH; 30 mM) and VX-809 (1, 3, 5 and 10 μM) for 12 h (A) or VX-809 (10 μM) for 2, 5 and 10 h (C). Pancreas slices were excited at 405 nm (Hoechst 33342) and 488 nm (Alexa Fluor 488), and emissions were collected at 405–465 and 488–550 nm, respectively. Scale bar = 20 μm. Summary bar charts show the dose-dependent (B) and time-dependent (D) effect of VX-809. Mean fluorescence intensity in the ductal cells was normalized to the ductal area and expressed in arbitrary units. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.001 (30 mM EtOH) vs. apical staining intensity of control (n = 5–8 per group).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Fluorescence, Staining, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 4. Effect of VX-770 on CFTR expression Representative histological images show CFTR expression after treatment of the pancreatic ducts with ethanol (EtOH; 30 mM) and VX-770 (1, 3, 5 and 10 μM) for 12 h (A) or VX-770 (10 μM) for 2, 5 and 10 h (C). Pancreas slices were excited at 405 nm (Hoechst 33342) and 488 nm (Alexa Fluor 488), and emissions were collected at 405–465 and 488–550 nm, respectively. Scale bar = 20 μm. Summary bar charts show the dose-dependent (B) and time-dependent (D) effect of VX-809. Mean fluorescence intensity in the ductal cells was normalized to the ductal area and expressed in arbitrary units. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.001 (30 mM EtOH), P < 0.001 (1 μM VX-770), P < 0.001 (3 μM VX-770), P = 0.0078 (2 h VX-770) and P = 0.0014 (5 h VX-770) vs. apical staining intensity of control (n = 5–8 per group).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Fluorescence, Staining, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 5. Effect of VX-809/VX-770 combination treatment on CFTR expression. Representative histological images show CFTR expression after treatment of the pancreatic ducts with ethanol (EtOH; 30 mM) and a combination of VX-809 and VX-770 (1, 3, 5 and 10 μM) (A) or with different concentrations of EtOH (50 and 100 mM) and a combination of VX-809 and VX-770 (10 μM) (C). Pancreas slices were excited at 405 nm (Hoechst 33342) and 488 nm (Alexa Fluor 488), and emissions were collected at 405–465 and 488–550 nm, respectively. Scale bar = 20 μm. Summary bar charts show the effect of the combination at 30 mM (B) and at 50 and 100 mM (D) EtOH. Mean fluorescence intensity in the ductal cells was normalized to the ductal area and expressed in arbitrary units. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.001 (30 mM EtOH), P < 0.001 (50 mM EtOH), P < 0.001 (100 mM EtOH) and P < 0.001 (100 mM EtOH + 10 μM combination) vs. apical staining intensity of control. P = 0.012 (50 mM EtOH) and P = 0.009 (100 mM EtOH) vs. cytoplasm staining intensity of control (n = 5–8 per group).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Fluorescence, Staining, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 6. Effect of ethanol and CFTR modulators on the activity of CFTR A, current–voltage (I–V) relationships were obtained by measuring forskolin-stimulated CFTR currents over a 4 ms period starting 495 ms into the voltage pulse. B, representative whole cell currents recorded before and after stimulation with 5 μM forskolin. C, summary of current densities (measured at +60 mV) in forskolin-stimulated cells. The current densities have been normalized to the cell input capacitance (pA/pF). Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.001 (30 mM EtOH), P < 0.001 (10 μM VX-770) and P < 0.001 (10 μM combination) vs. control. ∗∗P < 0.001 (10 μM VX-770 + 30 mM EtOH), P < 0.001 (10 μM VX-809 + 30 mM EtOH) and P < 0.001 (10 μM combination + 30 mM EtOH) vs. ethanol (n = 3–5 per group).
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 9. Activity and expression of CFTR in acute pancreatitis A, current–voltage (I–V) relationships were obtained by measuring forskolin-stimulated CFTR currents over a 4 ms period starting 495 ms into the voltage pulse. B, summary of current densities (measured at +60 mV) in forskolin-stimulated cells. The current densities have been normalized to the cell input capacitance (pA/pF). Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.001 (Orkambi) and P < 0.001 (AP) vs. Phys. Sal. (control). ∗∗P < 0.001 (AP + Orkambi) vs. AP (n = 4–6 per group). C, representative immunohistochemical staining shows the presence of CFTR in pancreatic samples from the control (phys. sal) and EtOH-treated (AP) animals with or without Orkambi treatment. Scale bar = 50 μm. D, summary bar chart shows the effect of AP with or without Orkambi treatment on the expression of CFTR. Mean fluorescence intensity in the ductal cells was normalized to the ductal area and expressed in arbitrary units. Data represent the mean ± SD for 5–8 specimens/five animals each group. ∗P = 0.05 (Orkambi) and P < 0.001 (AP) vs. apical staining intensity of Phys. Sal. (control). ∗∗P = 0.028 vs. apical staining intensity of AP. ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. cytoplasm staining intensity of Phys. Sal (control). Phys sal., physiological saline; AP, acute pancreatitis.
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Expressing, Control, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Fluorescence, Saline
Related Articles
Labeling:Article Title: Up-regulation of Acid-gated Na+ Channels (ASICs) by Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Co-expression in Xenopus Oocytes Article Snippet: .. Rat brain tissue sections were labeled with one or two of the following antibodies: a 1:50 dilution of polyclonal anti-CFTR antibodies (44); a 1:20 dilution of monoclonal anti-CFTR antibody (45); or a 1:20 dilution of |


